Spark Plugs
Spark Plugs
Hi Guys:
What is the current thinking regarding spark plugs for a 330 GT (9.5:1 CR)
The archives seem to suggest a preference for NGK plugs (various heat ranges, depending on use). They all appear to be conventional plugs.
Are there any virtues in using the platinum tipped plugs, or even the newer iridium tipped plugs? Has anyone actual experience with these?. Or is it only the heat range that matters, when using conventional ignition?
Cheers
Warren
What is the current thinking regarding spark plugs for a 330 GT (9.5:1 CR)
The archives seem to suggest a preference for NGK plugs (various heat ranges, depending on use). They all appear to be conventional plugs.
Are there any virtues in using the platinum tipped plugs, or even the newer iridium tipped plugs? Has anyone actual experience with these?. Or is it only the heat range that matters, when using conventional ignition?
Cheers
Warren
330 GT Series II sn 10069
-
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 5:53 pm
I use NGK plugs in both Ferraris and am quite pleased. I have been using NGK for many years starting with my Fiat 500 back in 1972. With only 22 horsepower, the right plug really counts on that car. I would avoid the iridium plugs though. All though they seem to work well, I have seen the thin wire tips break off. You don't want to take any chances with a broken tip landing somewhere in that V12.
Rudy van Daalen Wetters
1963 GTE s/n 4001
1966 330 GT s/n 8705
Rudy van Daalen Wetters
1963 GTE s/n 4001
1966 330 GT s/n 8705
-
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 5:53 pm
Hi William,
On the GTE I use B7ES for normal street driving. I would avoid BP7ES since it has the projected tip. When I first got the car it was running on 11 cylinders because one of the plugs, a BP7ES, was closed and not firing. The reason was that the head does not give adequate clearance for the projected tip plug and in installing the plug, the head configuration caused the two electrodes to be pushed together.
Rudy van Daalen Wetters
1963 GTE s/n 4001
1966 330 GT s/n 8705
On the GTE I use B7ES for normal street driving. I would avoid BP7ES since it has the projected tip. When I first got the car it was running on 11 cylinders because one of the plugs, a BP7ES, was closed and not firing. The reason was that the head does not give adequate clearance for the projected tip plug and in installing the plug, the head configuration caused the two electrodes to be pushed together.
Rudy van Daalen Wetters
1963 GTE s/n 4001
1966 330 GT s/n 8705
-
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 5:53 pm
-
- Posts: 1908
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:13 am
- Location: San Francisco Area
I also use NGKs. I would recommend non-resistor plugs. Start with the correct heat range and if you foul the plugs, go up a heat range on the plugs you foul (this is especially true if your engine has different compression and leakdown numbers on various cylinders). This will help compensate for any wear issues your engine may have.
Regards,
Art S.
Regards,
Art S.
1965 330 2+2 series 2 7919
Spark Plugs
Thanks guys
NGK it is:
Art : Is the heat range different than normal for a "new" engine, about 3K miles, but with 9.5:1 CR? Is there a specific plug number I should ask for? There were several mentioned, all seemed to be OK for the cars they were being used in. The engine seems to be broken in by now.
Cheers
Warren
NGK it is:
Art : Is the heat range different than normal for a "new" engine, about 3K miles, but with 9.5:1 CR? Is there a specific plug number I should ask for? There were several mentioned, all seemed to be OK for the cars they were being used in. The engine seems to be broken in by now.
Cheers
Warren
330 GT Series II sn 10069
Re: Spark Plugs
Warren, are you souping up the Ferrari? Our engines have a comression ratio of 8.8:1 and you mention 9.5:1? What up?whturner wrote:Thanks guys
NGK it is:
Art : Is the heat range different than normal for a "new" engine, about 3K miles, but with 9.5:1 CR? Is there a specific plug number I should ask for? There were several mentioned, all seemed to be OK for the cars they were being used in. The engine seems to be broken in by now.
Cheers
Warren
Yale
Ex - 1964 330GT #6097
1963 Abarth Monomille
1970 Porsche 911S
1974 BMW 2002turbo
1963 Abarth Monomille
1970 Porsche 911S
1974 BMW 2002turbo
Hi Yale:
Souping up - well just a little. When the engine was being rebuilt I went with a bit higher compression ratio pistons. Gives a little more torque at low speeds, probably very little at high engine speeds, where breathing gets to be the limiting factor. Nothing else, unless I upgrade the ignition, as you did.
Cheers
Warren
Souping up - well just a little. When the engine was being rebuilt I went with a bit higher compression ratio pistons. Gives a little more torque at low speeds, probably very little at high engine speeds, where breathing gets to be the limiting factor. Nothing else, unless I upgrade the ignition, as you did.
Cheers
Warren
330 GT Series II sn 10069
-
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 5:53 pm
-
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2002 7:22 am
-
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 5:53 pm
Tim,
I went with the Crane Fireball XR700 electronic ignition. I know there are quite a few out there, but after doing a lot of research I chose this one and have been most satisfied with it. It is an easy installation too. I can appreciate the intricant workings of the dual points systems but I thought for practicality I'd try the electronic system on the GTE. My 330 GT is still on the standard system and runs so well, I will leave it be for now.
Rudy van Daalen Wetters
1963 GTE s/n 4001
1966 330 GT s/n 8705
I went with the Crane Fireball XR700 electronic ignition. I know there are quite a few out there, but after doing a lot of research I chose this one and have been most satisfied with it. It is an easy installation too. I can appreciate the intricant workings of the dual points systems but I thought for practicality I'd try the electronic system on the GTE. My 330 GT is still on the standard system and runs so well, I will leave it be for now.
Rudy van Daalen Wetters
1963 GTE s/n 4001
1966 330 GT s/n 8705
Yes, NGK heat ranges are the higher the number, the cooler the plug. I use BP7ES and BP6ES in my Daytonas, C/4, etc. In general, in California, the warmer BP6ES is a better plug. You also run a larger gap than normal. Lots of technical mumbo-jumbo here, but the bottom line is that the California formulated gas has less engery per volume. NGK sent me several sets of plugs in different heat ranges and had me put them in my cars, run them for 300 miles, take them out and send them down to them. They cut them open lengthwise to see the burn pattern to determine the correct plug. BP6ES it was for standard driving. For a 288 GTO it was a 9 thin wire (EVX, EIX, etc.) and for a 512TR is was the 8 heat range thin wire plug. I had NGK plug heat ranges from 5 to 10 to try.
The great news here is that BP6ES is the same plug as a Datusn 500, or something like that, uses and the plugs are dirt cheap. Well under $2 a plug.
Steve
The great news here is that BP6ES is the same plug as a Datusn 500, or something like that, uses and the plugs are dirt cheap. Well under $2 a plug.
Steve